Protecting Bridle Trails
This website will provide information about the legal status of the dedicated trails of Compton Green, the anti trail BULLIES and hypocrites who live in Compton Green.
If you click on Compton Green News, above, you will also get the complete details of an incident between me, John, and Hellene "Lee" Davis, a anti trail user bully, hypocrite. Hellene "Lee" Davis is a "NOT IN MY BACK YARD" NIMBY, anti trail user bully person and she has support from those who also have closed trail segments. You will see how drastic the measures the Bullies will go to fight the use of the dedicated easement. Together they are Bullies. These same people are financial donors to the preservation of the Bridle Trails State Park. Just stay off the dedicated easement on their property which they are legally bound to maintain.
You Bullies need to ask attorneys Ken Hart and Charles Kimbrough for the truth. These two scoundrels can not answer the real legal questions so they hide. Both are absent legal ethical character. Kimbrough has been disciplined by the WSBA. Just ask Kimbrough if he has ever lost any rights to any easements in Compton Green. Ask him if any easement has been extinguished to his rights. Kimbrough has a trail easement behind his house but does not want you to use it. He thinks he is a special person who can go walk on other trails on other property but noooooooooooooo don't use his. He is a hypocrite. Worse is he became a paid attorney in the lawsuit and he was inside guiding to keep the truth hidden. Kimbrough had a conflict of interest. He was a property owner with a closed easement and an attorney being paid. His wife Nancy was a board member approving her husband being paid.
This website will keep the legal issues simple as they really are. The bottom line is that the dedicated easements of Compton Green are legal easements, properly dedicated, are required to be maintained by each property owner in Compton Green and that maintenance is guaranteed by the Compton Green HOA. That is the law.
Everyone who lives east of 116th, west of 140th and north of 8th and south of 40th are all easement owners of the Compton Green dedicated easements. There are 4000+/- such property owners today. The developer and grantee, McGrath Homes, was required by law to organize a group to maintain the dedicated easements. He did so about four months prior to the recording of the plat of Compton Green. The complete dedicated trail system is found on the real map of Compton Green.
Yes there was a lawsuit over a dedicated trail easement in the 90s. That case was a sham by the attorneys, Charles Kimbrough, Ken Hart, Mark Davidson and Judge Finkle. This site will talk about the sham which really should be a shame on these attorneys and the Judge. What is true is the people who sued to stop the use of a dedicated Bridle Trail Easement and their attorney Ken Hart know that a case today over a dedicated easement would be over the law and they would lose. I have heard this through the grapevine so to speak. The anti trail people know the sham. They have no shame in winning something they know they did and do not deserve.
The attorneys, Ken Hart, Charles Kimbrough, and Mark Davidson either had no idea what they were doing, or knew the law and avoided the law any which way they could.
Ken Hart and Charles Kimbrough, THESE TWO SCOUNDRALS, knew the law. Mark Davidson, my attorney was just bad. Oh he knew how to do depositions and motions but did not know land use or how to present the law to a judge. There is another page here where I write about him.
The case was a land use case. Kimbrough and Hart went onto a personal attack. Kimbrough, he has no shame. Such a liar and always to benefit him financially. He billed for having conversations with his own wife, Nancy. Kimbrough was upfront on the personal attacks. These scoundrels billed hours for which there really was no purpose but to bill hours. These scoundrels avoided the applicable laws.
All we ever did was protect our legal rights and those of others to use the easements. For that we got in return personal attacks. The stuff I have heard is astounding. It's still a small world out there and everything goes around and around. And changes by the time it's been around.
There are so many hypocrites in Compton Green regarding the trails. They like to walk the trails that are open on properties but they do not want anyone walking or using the trail on their property. They will actually come out and bully you to get off of the trail and leave. Susan Temple is one who has done this.
Then there is Charles Kimbrough. First off, and it explains a lot about him, is he is an attorney. He has been punished by the Washington State Bar Association. Kimbrough is the worst of the worst attorneys. During the legal matter about the trails he was willing to give up his rights to the trails so that the trail on his property would not be used. That's right, he has a dedicated trail easement on his property that he does not want anyone to use. He pushed himself into representing the HOA so that he could defeat the dedicated trail easements. He had a right in the dedicated trail easement which was in question. He never protected his rights or the rights of so many others who have a right to the dedicated trail easements. Kimbrough likes to play the game of driving legal fees up so he benefits.
Hey Kimbrough, Chucky man, be honest with the association. Do you continue to have an easement right in the Brunhaver 5 dedicated easements? Did you have an easement right back in 1995? Why did you not protect your rights? Was it because you have a closed easement and you don't want it to be used? Chucky, you like and walk the open trails don't you? Why don't you come clean with what you did. You just gave away member easement rights. Why don't you speak about this?
Hey Ken Hart! In 1995, did Kimbrough have easment rights in the Brunhaver 5 easements? Did Meiser have a right in Brunhavers? Did Brunhaver have a right in Meisers? Did Schock have rights in Brunhaver? Did Brunhave have rights in Schocks? Did Haj have rights in Brunhavers and Schocks? Did Brunaher and Schock have rights in Haj's. You see where this goes. Everone had rights in each others . Why is it that we are the only ones to lose any rights? Why don't you come clean too? I have heard it through the grapevine how you have said that you only won because of Davidson and Finkle's incompetence.